<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 23:25:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-216</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@Jim Our wire is supplied by Celani and his manufacturing partners B]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-216</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jim Johnson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-209</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Great work, all around. Great that you got to use a SEM. Query: have you compared your SEM images to the one's that Celani published (link to a copy, here)? http://lenrconnect.com/group/replication-cookbook/page/celani-s-wire-preparation-presentation Your 7th photo above and Celani's 4th (in his preso, many pages in) have very simliar looking features. It does not look like your wire has gone into the resintering that he warned about. And his photos describe the same sort of outer layer and cracking. Looks very promising!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jim Johnson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-209</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-203</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Ecco It is step 4 in our plan as detailed here http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/component/content/article/18-about-mfmp/85-plan-steps]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-203</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-202</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It would be interesting to see SEM images of active wires after they have been used. But I guess this is for much later on.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 00:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-202</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-201</link>
			<description><![CDATA[David, thank you for you analysis. It may be that there was an excited person run past the cell in a lab coat and force a gust of air past the shield. In Korea, you could see clearly on Celani's outputs when the AC of the Daejon Convention Centre turned on and off.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 23:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-201</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Roberson says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-200</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Excellent pictures! I made a couple of quick charts of the glass temperature and mica temperature versus time and it appears as if there is a rapid negative temperature transient in each curve followed by a recovery slope. The sharp drop shows up on the outside glass before the inside glass which suggests that the effect is external to the test device. Also, the magnitude of the variations tend to become less as you measure inward from the outer glass surface toward the mica. Have you found a cause for this effect yet? The rate at which the temperature drops appears unusual. I was expecting a much milder slope.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Roberson</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 23:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-200</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mathieu Valat says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-198</link>
			<description><![CDATA[As Bob mentioned Celani seem to consider the game won already. We'll se all together tomorrow though. I don't want to get too excited before we have the results we expect. @Al Potenza 1 Control uses Isotan44. Same as Celani uses BEFORE his magic treatment happen. 2 It would be wrong to do it since the wire is loaded and producing heat... 3 It is a very relevant question since H2 is molecular gaz and He monoatimic gaz! That is why we did a run with Isotan44 under H2 and another with ACTIVE wire under He. The next blog post might clarify this. You know, you can always use the forum to get answers to you questions.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Mathieu Valat</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-198</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>freethinker says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-197</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Yes guys, this is awesome i/o from your ongoing project. Can only join the accolades - again. Very nice SEMs. :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>freethinker</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-197</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Al Potenza says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-196</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Sorry this is a bit off the current topic. I watched the video about calibrations but I am still unclear about what is being compared. In other words, what is different between "control" and "experimental" runs? Will you be comparing the heat output of a loaded wire in helium to the same wire in hydrogen? Will you be comparing the heat output of the untreated constantan heater wire with that of the loaded/treated wire? In other words, could you clarify exactly what components are being tested and in what atmosphere for, respectively, a blank run, a calibration run and an experimental run? One concern I had was the difference between the thermal conductivity of hydrogen and helium. Will that effect be relevant and if so will it be considered? Thanks! Sorry if this was explained and if I missed somewhere.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Al Potenza</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-196</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-195</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ Kari - yes - absolutely bucket loads of NAEs mounted on a conductor @ Carta - we do to - but we will be very lucky too, if we do, then it will be testament to the robustness of the Celani approach and his wire, if we don't - then that wont stop us, we are first timers at this experiment so we have to be guarded about getting too excited at this stage. The really positive thing was the drop in resistance seen during the early loading phase - this follows Celanis observation, let's hope that when we go to the next stage of the experiment we have the fortune to see the all important excess heat. Remember - we are aware that things might not be perfect, but we are at this stage only trying to satisfy ourselves so that we can, with social help, take this to the world. We are so happy that we can share this with you as we try.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-195</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Carta says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-194</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I just hope you will be able to replicate excess heat. But let me tell you one thing guys: YOU ARE GGGGREAT! (Thanks to Prof. Celani too to experiment this) R.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Carta</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-194</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Kari says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-193</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Super, This looks like lots of NAEs a la Storms... Can't wait until tomorrow.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-193</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
