<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>QuantumHeat.org</title>
		<description>Discuss QuantumHeat.org</description>
		<link>http://www.quantumheat.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:13:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/de/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Jamel says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-13788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[%% Review my site ... window repairs: http://stephenhtcfh.dreamyblogs.com/11576546/tips-to-find-the-nearest-window-repair]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jamel</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2022 19:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-13788</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>LastJulius says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8983</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I have noticed you don't monetize your page, don't waste your traffic, you can earn additional cash every month because you've got high quality content. If you want to know how to make extra money, search for: Mertiso's tips best adsense alternative]]></description>
			<dc:creator>LastJulius</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-8983</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-199</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Thanks Paul. I initially discounted such sharp voltage increments as I assumed you would be careful not to place unnecessary thermal shock on the Celani wire.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 22:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-199</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-192</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The answer is yes. Those steps were manual adjustments to the voltage.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-192</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-190</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Perhaps I can answer my own question. Are the resistance measurement jumps due to the wire temperature being increased in two discrete steps? If yes - my question is irrelevant.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 13:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-190</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-187</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Perhaps another way of stating the problem of graph 1311 is that possibly, external electrical power equipment switching on or off are introducing errors into the resistance measurement at a magnitude comparable to the effect you are looking at. A critical reviewer would not be happy with that.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-187</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>David Jones says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-186</link>
			<description><![CDATA[In the top graph (resistance of wire verses time – Records 1311) you have instantaneous increases in resistance. This has to be an experimental artefact - to my mind anyway. Would you have any idea why this has occurred? A critical reviewer of your experimentation would spot this anomaly and would want this cleared up - as the implication is there is an error/fault in your diagnostics.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>David Jones</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-186</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-180</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi Peter, at this stage we are just working to replicate and extend Celani's work. There is much debate about the science - we need to first show incontrovertibl y that there is an effect.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 08:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-180</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Peter Gluck says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-175</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Congrats very professional approach and execution! Do you have a working hypothesis, WHY it works- if it works? Wish you success, positive results beyond any doubt. Peter]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Peter Gluck</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-175</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Paul Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-174</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The impedance is being measured at DC by measuring the ratio of voltage to current.. As such it has no phase angle and is the same as resistance. I don't have ripple numbers handy but it is in the millivolt range, The A to D conversions are averaged for several seconds, mostly eliminating ripple.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Paul Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 02:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-174</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GreenWin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-171</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fascinating work gentlemen, thank you!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GreenWin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 23:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-171</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nicolas Chauvin says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-170</link>
			<description><![CDATA[The impedance of Celani's wire continues to drop with the H2 loading. We are now reaching 15.5 ohms, starting from 18.4 ohms. R/R0 is almost 0.84 now. By looking at the slope asymptote, we should be able to get the wire down to 15.0 ohms.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nicolas Chauvin</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-170</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-169</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ By comment #3 of Robert Greenyer, indirect heating.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-169</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Valac  says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-168</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Could you please clarify how the Impedance or Resistance are being measured? If it was a DC resistance measurement (assuming current supplied from a Switch-mode converter) could you please publish the ripple current(s) spec for uncertainty calculation? If it was an Impedance measurement (resultant of real component, reactive component and the theta angle), could you please publish the reactive component(s) of Celani's wire as compared to control wires, at fixed temperature, in air? and supply frequency? angle? The mainstream critics will have to look into these.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Valac </dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-168</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Patrik says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-167</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Any update on the resistance? Does it continue to drop? Maybe you have another graph perhaps?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Patrik</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-167</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Arnaud says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-166</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Is the loading by indirect heating or by direct heating of celani's wire ?]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Arnaud</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-166</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-164</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@7, Thanks for the clarification! I figured it was likely beforehand. I would expect the higher impedance of the Celani wire would mean a higher temperature for the same current compared to the other Isotran, but could always be wrong. As you point out, at least it's easy enough to compensate for with a slight adjustment. This is fascinating work!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-164</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-163</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Some more thoughts: I think I remember with the treatment Celani's wire went through, it increased the amount of oxidation in the wire. Oxidation should increase the impedance of the wire, so that may explain some of why Celani's wire has a higher resistance in He than the Isotran. The other potential factor I can think of are the micro surface breaks in the Celani wire may also have the same affect. Now, why there's a dip in resistance at a certain amperage... maybe that is some sweet voltage/current resonance spot for the wire. Otherwise.. I have no other guess as to why there's a random dip around 2 amps in both wires in inert atmosphere.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-163</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-162</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Run #2 in Helium was before the loading. In the data from Helium runs 1 and 2 with we are seeing higher temperatures achieved by the Celani wire. That means the correlations developed with the other wires may need some adjusting to be valid. We'll see.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-162</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ged says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-161</link>
			<description><![CDATA[It's good we're seeing the impedance falling so much during hydrogen loading! Was that Run #2 in He done after or before the loading? That's the biggest question I have right now for trying to make sense of the data. Looks like it's almost time for a serious run in hydrogen. I don't know about you guys, but I'm getting excited. So many great controls to compare with; you guys have done phenomenally.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ged</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-161</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sanjeev says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-160</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Dropping resistance is a good sign. Celani's observations are confirmed. Now the chances of seeing the excess heat effect have increased a lot.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Sanjeev</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-160</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ecco says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-159</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Ah! True. I thought you were heating the Celani wire directly. Then, it would be interesting to make a chart of reactor temperature against R/Ro (Active wire) over time to see at what temperature (and maybe also hydrogen pressure? it should increase with heat, but at the same time it should also decrease due to adsorption into the active wire) wire impedance starts to drop, as Celani often noted in his ICCF17 presentation.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ecco</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-159</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Robert Greenyer says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-158</link>
			<description><![CDATA[During loading, the Celani wire/cell is passively heated by the other NiChrome wire in the cell.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Robert Greenyer</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 19:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-158</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ryan Hunt says:</title>
			<link>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-155</link>
			<description><![CDATA[We're seeing R/R0 in the 0.88 range already. Celani saw that ratio after 10^5 seconds.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Ryan Hunt</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.quantumheat.org#comment-155</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
